Innovation Survival: Innovation in Science
Google Tech Talk
April 8, 2010
ABSTRACT
Presented by W. David Schwaderer.
Innovation is essential for all progress and competitive survival. It provides a democratic vehicle for individuals and upstarts to challenge and neutralize powerful incumbents. Yet, because change accompanies innovation, it is a double-edged sword.
This presentation examines the historical reception transformative scientific breakthroughs initially received before widespread adoption. By example, it teaches principles that can help ensure change agents personally, and their organizations, are on the delivering side of innovation’s sharp edge.
W. David Schwaderer has a Masters Degree in Applied Mathematics from the California Institute of Technology and an MBA from the University of Southern California. He has worked at IBM, EDS, Adaptec, Symantec, and Silicon Valley startups. He has authored six commercial software programs for a variety of machine architectures using several different languages, dozens of articles, and ten technical books that explain complex technology in approachable ways. David’s soon-to-be-published 11th book follows over 10 years of research and is titled “Innovation Survival – Concept, Courage, Chance, and Change”.
Duration : 0:59:56
[youtube Dxc1s0vlghY]
June 17th, 2010 at 4:31 am
will pay charges …
will pay charges later!
June 17th, 2010 at 4:31 am
All of my chums …
All of my chums downloaded the zero cost version of L4D2 over there at L4D2dlXcom (replace X with . ) a few days ago, and it operates wonderfully. This video game was built for on the internet! Get it and play it if you have not already!
June 17th, 2010 at 4:31 am
@rabbitwho Bullshit.
@rabbitwho Bullshit.
June 17th, 2010 at 4:31 am
screw the …
screw the european invasors!!
June 17th, 2010 at 4:31 am
When attaching the …
When attaching the self to any thought or physicality, one risks the pain of detachment in all cases.
(~?~)
June 17th, 2010 at 4:31 am
Maybe the problem …
Maybe the problem is that too many people think science is their religion; they can’t accept that they might be wrong because it means they’ve wasted their lives, and if it was their own theory or something they’ve built their theories around then having it proved wrong is literally denying them life after death.
So in the end something that should be the pursuit of truth becomes almost a fetish and the pursuit of glory.